Follow @wfpman

After eight years the MSHA will actually do something…

with 2 comments

Today, the U.S. Senate confirmed Joe Main—by unanimous consent—as the new leader of the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration MSHA.Main is a longtime advocate for safety and health in the mining industry. He worked 22 years as director of Occupational Health and Safety for the Mine Workers UMWA. That’s a huge change from the Bush-era head of MSHA, coal-industry lobbyist Richard Stickler, who came under fire for failure to enforce mining safety laws.

via AFL-CIO NOW BLOG | New Mine Safety Chief: The Change We Needed.

Think of some of the recent mine disasters. You had the Sago Mine in West Virginia, the Darby Mine in Kentucky and of course the Crandall Canyon Mine in Utah (with that rotund fool of a mine owner all over TV after the incident). All of these disasters were made worse or could have been prevented if the MSHA under Bush did what it was supposed to do.

Of course the MSHA under Bush could not regulate mines. It was run by a former mining industry insider! Just with the US Senate confirming a new chief, miners are already safer. Joe Main hasn’t even done anything yet and he is already better than the previous head of MSHA. It’s hard to say who was worse in the Bush administration: Richard Stickler or Heckuva Job Brownie?

Related posts:

  1. Crandall Canyon managers should be prosecuted
  2. More Miner Fatalities
  3. Two more Sago Mine disasters

Written by Jason Gooljar

October 22nd, 2009 at 9:10 pm

Posted in Labor

Tagged with ,

opinions powered by SendLove.to
  • Richard James

    Yeah, so things are “already better” and he has not done anything to date. Nice. Well, that automatically qualifies him for a Nobel Peace Prize.

    And the “change we needed” is a priceless headline. Yeah, cause union represented mines are low and they need an insider of sorts to help further their agenda…. Again, another reason why things are already better. Yeah, right.

  • http://www.jasongooljar.com Jason Gooljar

    Richard,

    In regards to your sarcastic reply. You obviously do not recognize the grave danger the miners were in. Look at all the recent coal disasters. They’ve all happened within a very close-knit time frame. Miners were ill represented by an agency in the MSHA that was supposed to be concerned with their safety. This is why I say that the mere fact that we have left the past behind is cause for celebration. They are indeed safer as we speak.

    Even going back to the days of the Ludlow Massacre coal mining has been an extremely dangerous job. I suspect other sorts of mining have their dangers as well. What these miners do is nothing short of heroic. Personally, I dislike coal and I don’t believe that there can be such a thing as “clean coal.” I look to the day when we will have an alternative energy source that will replace coal. Then these miners could hopefully have jobs in the new green economy. But to sum things up this is a welcome change at the MSHA. I’m sorry that you disagree.