Archive for the ‘at&t’ tag

AT&T about to feel some pain from the unions?

View Comments

I just read on the AFL-CIO blog that 30,000 workers (CWA) have rejected AT&T’s final offer.

Some 30,000 AT&T workers in five states, represented by the Communications Workers of America (CWA), have rejected what the company declared to be its ”best and final” offer to resolve a nearly three-month contract dispute. Union leaders repeatedly have said they are optimistic a deal can be reached before workers walk off the job.

This has been an ongoing fight. I don’t think they should have called this their “final offer”. I’m sure there’s more talks going on right now anyway.

Written by Jason Gooljar

May 18th, 2009 at 11:05 pm

Posted in Labor

Tagged with

A Twitter campaign against AT and T during the Masters?

View Comments

I got this email from the Communications Workers of America talking about AT&T and the Masters Tournament. The interesting strategy I read about in this email is the CWA’s embracing of Twitter to spread the word about AT&T’s corporate greed.

When you send your "tweets," be sure to include a link to our petition (www.standupforworkers.com) and add #masters to the end of your message. This will make sure that other Twitter users who are following the Masters Tournament will see your messages about AT&T.

They even have some example tweets you can send or make up your own if you’d like.

AT&T is the leading sponsor of the 2009 Masters Tournament. The thinking goes that if they have the money to do this, they have the money to stop job cuts and the taking away of health care benefits.

Written by Jason Gooljar

April 10th, 2009 at 11:10 pm

Posted in Labor

Tagged with , , ,

Google creating broadband monitoring tools to fight back

View Comments

I think it’s great that Google is creating so called “net neutrality” tools to monitor ISP’s who are doing wrong.

In response, the Federal Communications Commission announced it would investigate the charges, and in May, a bill was re-introduced into Congress that would rewrite U.S. antitrust law to prohibit network operators like AT&T and Comcast from blocking, impairing, or discriminating against “lawful” Internet content, applications, and services or charging extra fees for “prioritization or enhanced quality of service.”

Written by Jason Gooljar

June 15th, 2008 at 10:16 pm

Posted in Corporatism

Tagged with , , ,