Follow @wfpman

Archive for the ‘monsanto’ tag

Agent Orange in the news again

without comments

For creating such a horrible chemical in Agent Orange, Monsanto and its leadership should forever have to wear scarlet letters. I don’t care about the world according to Monsanto (I support the film though). I want a world without them. Like Dow Chemical in Bhopal and Chevron in Ecuador, Monsanto must atone for their sins eventually even if it takes decades.

I came across this article in the BBC talking about the United States helping South Korea in an Agent Orange inquiry.

Three US Army veterans said they buried about 250 barrels of the hazardous chemical at a US military base in Chilgok, south-east of Seoul, in 1978.

I can only imagine what this has done to people in the surrounding area. After all, the barrels will eventually leak. The sad part is the United States fails to acknowledge the chemical’s ties to birth defects. They say there’s no “internationally accepted” scientific evidence. The pictures I’ve seen on the Internet and in the documentary The Corporation are all the evidence I need to damn this corporation to hell.

Written by Jason Gooljar

May 22nd, 2011 at 3:48 pm

Posted in Corporatism

Tagged with

Monsanto tries to go around the court – gets smacked down

without comments

U.S. District Court Judge Jeffrey White in August banned the planting and sales of Monsanto’s “Roundup Ready” biotech sugar beets after determining that their approval in 2005 by the USDA was illegal. He said the government must conduct a thorough environmental review before approving the crop to comply with the law.

But shortly after the ruling, the USDA issued permits allowing companies to plant seedlings to produce seed for future GMO sugar beet crops.

In his ruling Tuesday Judge White said those seedlings “shall be removed from the ground.”

via CorpWatch : USA: Monsanto GMO sugarbeets to be destroyed: court.

If you don’t like the ruling go around it right? Damn those activist judges right? Well unfortunately for Agent Monsanto Orange sometimes the judicial branch will have its way. Sure they could always lobby Congress for some new law that will let them contaminate the country with their “roundup ready” untested GMO creations I suppose.

Written by Jason Gooljar

December 4th, 2010 at 10:40 pm

The world plagued by Monsanto

with 2 comments

So I read on Common Dreams that Monsanto is trying to “fight back” using Web 2.0.

One example of a company that effectively did that is PC maker Dell Corp. Dell-bashing escalated a few years ago, giving rise to the term "Dell Hell." When the company finally started its own blog, it became the forum of choice for critics.

Monsanto similarly appears to be trying to steer discussion about critical issues to its blog so it’s easier to influence the debate, Barnes said.

"Now they’re controlling the posts, they’re answering the questions, they’re directing them to different places within Monsanto and maybe another site," she said. "They’ve taken control of the situation."

Why even bother to comment on their blog? That allows them to control the debate which cannot be allowed. It’s one thing to monitor their online activities but totally another thing to engage them on their own battlefield. For example I follow the dirty coal industry’s @americaspower on Twitter. I responded to them a few times but no more. There’s no point. Now I just monitor what they’re saying. It’s about building power against them not engaging them.

Monsanto has been in the cross hairs of social activists for decades, going back to its days as a maker of Agent Orange and PCBs. That didn’t change with the company’s new focus on biotech and agriculture.

A decade ago, activists expressed themselves by torching fields of genetically modified crops and throwing tofu cream pies at Monsanto’s chairman. These days, activists are challenging the company through the use of YouTube videos and countless blogs that demonize GMOs.

Facebook, the social networking site, is full of anti-Monsanto groups, including one, Millions Against Monsanto, with more than 22,000 members. Another group’s avatar depicts CEO Hugh Grant with a handful of soybeans. Below the words: "No Food Shall Be Grown That We Don’t Own." It seems there’s a way to revile the company in any language.

There is a reason to hate Monsanto and the entire board of directors and other executives, not only their current CEO Hugh Grant. After watching the documentary The Corporation I myself saw the face of evil. Just look at the cows in the documentary.

This is what Monsanto is capable of

Monsanto’s artificial bovine growth hormone BGH (Posilac) is designed to make cows produce more milk. Ignoring the fact that no body needs more milk one of the problems with the use of the hormone is that it pushes the cow to the limits of production and causes illness such as Mastitis. In Monsanto’s own words: "Use of Posilac has been associated with increases in cystic ovaries and disorders of the uterus…digestive disorders…enlarged hocks and lesions (lacerations, enlargements, calluses) of the knee…" On March 1993 the Veterinary Medicine Advisory Committee of the FDA unanimously agreed with the Monsanto conclusion that "Cows injected with Posilac are at an increased risk for clinical mastitis." If you drink milk you will be pleased to know that this disease is treatment with high levels of antibiotics which no doubt find their way into the milk supply. Since the introduction of BGH in the USA, reports of serious health and reproductive problems among U.S. cows have increased significantly.

The Internet is a tool that can be used by both sides. It is just one tool and it is not the only one either. The foundation will always be organizing and communication.

Written by Jason Gooljar

March 28th, 2009 at 3:04 pm

Posted in Corporatism

Tagged with ,

Monsanto and BASF to profit off of global warming?

without comments

These guys are like leeches I tell you.

The report of its investigation shows that Monsanto and BASF – which last year announced a $1.5bn “collaboration” to develop new GM crops, including “ones more tolerant to adverse environmental conditions such as drought” – have between them filed patents for 27 of the 55 genes. Others had been filed by companies such as Bayer, Syngenta and Dow.

It’s the corporate gold rush to get to the “climate tolerant” genes. The report by the ETC group in Canada ends by saying:

It concludes: “These patented technologies will ultimately concentrate corporate power, drive up costs, inhibit independent research and further undermine the rights of farmers to save and exchange seeds”.

Written by Jason Gooljar

June 8th, 2008 at 10:23 pm

Posted in Corporatism

Tagged with , , , ,